<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Canon Digital Camera Lenses</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.canondigitalcameralenses.org/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.canondigitalcameralenses.org</link>
	<description>Canon Digital Camera Lenses</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 02:16:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Canon Digital Camera Lenses</title>
		<link>http://www.canondigitalcameralenses.org/canon-digital-camera-lenses/</link>
		<comments>http://www.canondigitalcameralenses.org/canon-digital-camera-lenses/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 02:10:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://canondigitalcameralenses.org/?p=4</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Canon EF 14mm f/2.8 L II USM
The Canon EF 14mm f/2.8 L II USM Lens is currently my favorite ultra-wide angle EF lens. For many years, my preferred full-frame-capable ultra-wide angle lens was  Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8 L USM Lens  and then its replacement, the even better (at the wide end at least) [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Canon EF 14mm f/2.8 L II USM</p>
<p>The Canon EF 14mm f/2.8 L II USM Lens is currently my favorite ultra-wide angle EF lens. For many years, my preferred full-frame-capable ultra-wide angle lens was  Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8 L USM Lens  and then its replacement, the even better (at the wide end at least)  Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8 L II USM Lens . While this lens remains more versatile, the Canon EF 14mm f/2.8 L II USM Lens delivers even better image quality. I was simply not impressed with the original Canon EF 14mm f/2.8 L USM Lens  optically &#8211; and wasn&#8217;t very excited to hear about a replacement for it as I really like the 16-35mm II. However, within a couple of days of using the 14mm L II, my mind was changed.</p>
<p>Like all Canon L Series Lenses, the Canon EF 14mm f/2.8 L II USM Lens has a high build quality that feels great in use. The non-extending 3.1&#8243; x 3.7&#8243; (80mm x 90mm)(dxl) size and 22.7 oz (645g) weight combine to make this a very a nice handling lens. A bulging convex front lens element and a built-in metal lens hood are identity features of this lens. Because of these features, a normal flat lens cap cannot be used (more later) and a front filter cannot be mounted on this lens. A rear gelatin filter holder is provided. These filters are required to be cut to size and installed with the lens dismounted. Circular polarizer filters cannot be used.</p>
<p> Canon EF 15mm f/2.8 Fisheye Lens   </p>
<p>The Canon EF 15mm f/2.8 Fisheye Lens is currently Canon&#8217;s only  intentionally distorted  EF lens.</p>
<p>The heavy barrel distortion from the Canon EF 15mm f/2.8 Fisheye Lens creates a special effect that is liked by most people (until it is over-used of course). With digital capture, we can now use fisheye-to-rectilinear conversion software to create a corrected picture equivalent to what a 12-13mm rectilinear lens would yield. This is great &#8211; but it takes some extra post-processing work and requires some knowledge of what the end-result will look like when capturing the shot.</p>
<p>PTLens is a really easy to use (Low $) rectilinear conversion software program (or Photoshop Plugin) based on Panorama Tools (included and free). Photoshop&#8217;s lens correction tools can also retilinear-convert the fisheye distortion. The downside to rectilinear conversion is that the image corners become soft. Reducing the image to 70% or less allows much of the corner sharpness to be recovered at the expense of the pixel size of the image.</p>
<p>Build quality of the Canon EF 15mm f/2.8 Fisheye Lens is reasonable. The metal mount shows it is not a bottom of the line lens. The focus ring feels relatively low quality, but this lens does not cost a fortune either.</p>
<p> Canon TS-E 17mm f/4 L Tilt-Shift Lens   </p>
<p>The Canon TS-E 17mm f/4 L Tilt-Shift Lens is, at review time, the  widest tilt-shift SLR lens made . It is also one of the highest quality (both optically and physically) 17mm lenses made.</p>
<p>The Canon TS-E 17mm f/4 L Tilt-Shift Lens was introduced at the same time as the Canon TS-E 24mm f/3.5 L II Tilt-Shift Lens. Because of their similarities, I am borrowing some of the material/layout/text from the  Canon TS-E 24mm f/3.5 L II Tilt-Shift Lens review  for the Canon TS-E 17mm f/4 L Tilt-Shift Lens Review.</p>
<p>One of the first things you need to know about the Canon TS-E 17mm f/4 L Tilt-Shift Lens is that it, like all tilt-shift lenses, is a MF (Manual Focus)-only lens. If you need AF, this lens is not for you (or you may want two lenses covering 17mm).</p>
<p>With that fact in mind, I&#8217;ll next point out the &#8220;TS-E / Tilt-Shift&#8221; features of this lens indicated by the title. While these are extremely useful features, it is not a requirement that they be used. And since these features require more in-depth explanation, let&#8217;s review the non-tilt-shift aspects of this lens first. Please note: There are approximately 10 MB of images included in this review. Please be patient for them all to load.</p>
<p> Canon EF 20mm f/2.8 USM Lens   </p>
<p>The Canon EF 20mm f/2.8 USM Lens fits in a nice wide angle focal length space below the ultra-common 24-something and 28-something zoom lenses. There is a noticeable FOV (field of view) difference between 20mm and 24/28mm.</p>
<p>People often look for a prime lens for their ultra wide angle needs. Many people don&#8217;t use these focal lengths with great frequency and look to save some money by buying a non-zoom lens. Primes are often smaller, lighter, cheaper, sharper and faster than their more versatile zoom counterparts.</p>
<p>Upon upgrading from a 1.6x   body to a 1.3x FOVCF body, I was questioning whether I needed to keep the expensive  Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8 L USM Lens  in my kit. The Canon EF 20mm f/2.8 USM Lens would be as wide on my 1.3x body as the 16-35mm was on the 10D, just as fast and significantly less expensive. My L zooms cover my needs beyond 24mm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.canondigitalcameralenses.org/canon-digital-camera-lenses/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
